# | CROP/ COMMODITY | YEAR/ FARMING | FARMING SITUATION | PROBLEM/ OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFIED FOR WHICH SUCH INTERVENTIONS WAS UNDERTAKEN | FARMERS' PRACTICES | TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATED | RESULT | FEEDBACK |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | Maize | 2008-09 (Kharif) | Irrigated Medium land | Low yield due to poor nutrient management | - | INM in hybrid Maize P-30R77 | FP (T1)-72000 (25.2)COBS RP(T2)-102000 (40.8)COBS | Compatible with farming system. |
02 | Chilli | 2008-09 (Kharif) | Canal Irrigated Medium land | Low yield due to poor nutrient management | - | INM in Chilli var. Utkal Ava | FP (T1)- 56.0 RP (T2)- 71.0 | Compatible with farming system, More demonstration is needed for further spread. |
03 | Tomato | 2008-09 (Rabi) | Canal Irrigated Medium land | Low yield due to bacterial wilt | - | Cultivation of wilt resistant var. BT-10 | FP (T1)- 168.5 RP (T2)- 234.3 | Compatible with farming system, More demonstration is needed for further spread. |
04 | Cowpea | 2008-09 (Summer) | Canal Irrigated Medium land | Low yield due to poor nutrient management | - | Seed treatment with Rhizobium and PSB var. Utkal Manika | FP (T1)- 48 RP (T2)- 57.4 | Compatible with farming system, More demonstration is needed for further spread. |
05 | Pumpkin | 2008-09 (Summer) | Canal Irrigated Medium land | Low yield due to local variety | - | Cultivation of HYV of pumpkin var. Guamal | FP (T1)- 178.5 RP (T2)- 221.7 | Compatible with farming system, More demonstration is needed for further spread. |